Additional evidence in departmental appeals may include show-cause-notice material without introducing a new case where it merely corroborates existin...
Reasoned rectification orders require consideration of expenditure disclosed in income-tax returns, preventing revision based on incomplete income com...
Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer...
Third-party loose sheets require reliable nexus before supporting unexplained expenditure additions; presumptions do not establish payer identity or o...
TNMM comparability using audited accounts and working-capital adjustments can eliminate unwarranted transfer-pricing additions where verified margins ...
Gross-profit additions on disputed purchases require reasoned appellate determination; disclosed claims alone do not support inaccurate-particulars pe...
Limitation after transfer-pricing remand: fresh TPO reference did not extend the assessment deadline, rendering the consequential assessment time-barr...
Interim judicial restraint on tax deduction prevents default, while supporting reasonable cause and penalty deletion for foreign-leg LFC reimbursement...
Assessment u/s 144C - Period of limitation - The Ld. CIT-DR argued that the delay was due to the assessee's failure to participate in the verification process as directed by the DRP. However, the Tribunal noted that sub-section (8) of section 144C precludes the DRP from setting aside any proposed variation or issuing any direction for further enquiry and passing of the assessment order. The AO was mandated to complete the assessment within the specified time limit without providing any further opportunity of being heard to the assessee. - The Tribunal concluded that the final assessment order passed by the AO was barred by limitation and, therefore, null in the eyes of law.
Assessment u/s 144C - Period of limitation - The Ld. CIT-DR argued that the delay was due to the assessee's failure to participate in the verification process as directed by the DRP. However, the Tribunal noted that sub-section (8) of section 144C precludes the DRP from setting aside any proposed variation or issuing any direction for further enquiry and passing of the assessment order. The AO was mandated to complete the assessment within the specified time limit without providing any further opportunity of being heard to the assessee. - The Tribunal concluded that the final assessment order passed by the AO was barred by limitation and, therefore, null in the eyes of law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4894 
