Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability - Whether service of notice to the trust through its trustees suffices for the purpose of the NI Act. - The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging the trial court’s order summoning the petitioners in complaint cases filed u/s 138 NI Act. The Court held that serving notice to the trust through its trustees meets the legal requirement, making individual notices to trustees unnecessary. It further established that trustees can be held vicariously liable u/s 141 NI Act, and the amended complaints sufficiently detailed the petitioners’ involvement in the alleged transactions.
Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability - Whether service of notice to the trust through its trustees suffices for the purpose of the NI Act. - The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging the trial court’s order summoning the petitioners in complaint cases filed u/s 138 NI Act. The Court held that serving notice to the trust through its trustees meets the legal requirement, making individual notices to trustees unnecessary. It further established that trustees can be held vicariously liable u/s 141 NI Act, and the amended complaints sufficiently detailed the petitioners’ involvement in the alleged transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
