Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Imitation of CIRP - Admissibility of Intervention Petition - Homebuyers - Several intervention petitions were filed by unit holders in the project, seeking to dismiss the main company petition. These petitions were dismissed as well, with the NCLAT noting that the petitions were attempts to delay the CIRP process. - Additionally, the corporate debtor filed a scheme u/s 230 of the Companies Act, proposing to complete the project, arguing that the scheme should defer the Section 7 proceedings. However, the NCLAT found that the pending scheme could not halt the Section 7 application, emphasizing the need for an expeditious resolution as per the Supreme Court's directives.
Imitation of CIRP - Admissibility of Intervention Petition - Homebuyers - Several intervention petitions were filed by unit holders in the project, seeking to dismiss the main company petition. These petitions were dismissed as well, with the NCLAT noting that the petitions were attempts to delay the CIRP process. - Additionally, the corporate debtor filed a scheme u/s 230 of the Companies Act, proposing to complete the project, arguing that the scheme should defer the Section 7 proceedings. However, the NCLAT found that the pending scheme could not halt the Section 7 application, emphasizing the need for an expeditious resolution as per the Supreme Court's directives.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.