Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Salary income - Taxability of "fringe benefits" or "amenities" provided to employees - Validity of Section 17(2)(viii) and Rule 3(7)(i) - benefit enjoyed by bank employees from interest-free loans or loans at a concessional rate - The Supreme Court held that the legislative provision does not delegate essential legislative function unduly. It sets clear boundaries and standards for the CBDT to prescribe additional taxable perquisites. This adheres to permissible limits of subordinate legislation. - Both the provisions, i.e. section 17(2)(viii) and Rule 3(7)(i) are upheld as valid. - The appeals challenging their vires are dismissed. The Supreme Court upheld the legislative competence in delegating certain powers to the CBDT and validates the use of SBI's PLR as a benchmark for assessing the taxable value of perquisite.
Salary income - Taxability of "fringe benefits" or "amenities" provided to employees - Validity of Section 17(2)(viii) and Rule 3(7)(i) - benefit enjoyed by bank employees from interest-free loans or loans at a concessional rate - The Supreme Court held that the legislative provision does not delegate essential legislative function unduly. It sets clear boundaries and standards for the CBDT to prescribe additional taxable perquisites. This adheres to permissible limits of subordinate legislation. - Both the provisions, i.e. section 17(2)(viii) and Rule 3(7)(i) are upheld as valid. - The appeals challenging their vires are dismissed. The Supreme Court upheld the legislative competence in delegating certain powers to the CBDT and validates the use of SBI's PLR as a benchmark for assessing the taxable value of perquisite.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
