Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Indirect corporate control can create related-party status, excluding financial creditors from Committee of Creditors representation, participation an...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Salary income - Taxability of "fringe benefits" or "amenities" provided to employees - Validity of Section 17(2)(viii) and Rule 3(7)(i) - benefit enjoyed by bank employees from interest-free loans or loans at a concessional rate - The Supreme Court held that the legislative provision does not delegate essential legislative function unduly. It sets clear boundaries and standards for the CBDT to prescribe additional taxable perquisites. This adheres to permissible limits of subordinate legislation. - Both the provisions, i.e. section 17(2)(viii) and Rule 3(7)(i) are upheld as valid. - The appeals challenging their vires are dismissed. The Supreme Court upheld the legislative competence in delegating certain powers to the CBDT and validates the use of SBI's PLR as a benchmark for assessing the taxable value of perquisite.
Salary income - Taxability of "fringe benefits" or "amenities" provided to employees - Validity of Section 17(2)(viii) and Rule 3(7)(i) - benefit enjoyed by bank employees from interest-free loans or loans at a concessional rate - The Supreme Court held that the legislative provision does not delegate essential legislative function unduly. It sets clear boundaries and standards for the CBDT to prescribe additional taxable perquisites. This adheres to permissible limits of subordinate legislation. - Both the provisions, i.e. section 17(2)(viii) and Rule 3(7)(i) are upheld as valid. - The appeals challenging their vires are dismissed. The Supreme Court upheld the legislative competence in delegating certain powers to the CBDT and validates the use of SBI's PLR as a benchmark for assessing the taxable value of perquisite.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
