Transfer-pricing reimbursement adjustments require uncontrolled comparables and cannot become expense-genuineness reviews, resulting in deletion of th...
Food import sampling requirements support provisional release where unseized consignments conform to standards and raw areca classification is unestab...
Diagnostic microcuvette classification follows sole-use analytical function, placing specialised disposable cuvettes with their analyser rather than g...
Customs Broker licensing proceedings fail when their offence-report foundation collapses and authorisation, advisory, and KYC duties remain unbreached...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Salary income - Taxability of "fringe benefits" or "amenities" provided to employees - Validity of Section 17(2)(viii) and Rule 3(7)(i) - benefit enjoyed by bank employees from interest-free loans or loans at a concessional rate - The Supreme Court held that the legislative provision does not delegate essential legislative function unduly. It sets clear boundaries and standards for the CBDT to prescribe additional taxable perquisites. This adheres to permissible limits of subordinate legislation. - Both the provisions, i.e. section 17(2)(viii) and Rule 3(7)(i) are upheld as valid. - The appeals challenging their vires are dismissed. The Supreme Court upheld the legislative competence in delegating certain powers to the CBDT and validates the use of SBI's PLR as a benchmark for assessing the taxable value of perquisite.
Salary income - Taxability of "fringe benefits" or "amenities" provided to employees - Validity of Section 17(2)(viii) and Rule 3(7)(i) - benefit enjoyed by bank employees from interest-free loans or loans at a concessional rate - The Supreme Court held that the legislative provision does not delegate essential legislative function unduly. It sets clear boundaries and standards for the CBDT to prescribe additional taxable perquisites. This adheres to permissible limits of subordinate legislation. - Both the provisions, i.e. section 17(2)(viii) and Rule 3(7)(i) are upheld as valid. - The appeals challenging their vires are dismissed. The Supreme Court upheld the legislative competence in delegating certain powers to the CBDT and validates the use of SBI's PLR as a benchmark for assessing the taxable value of perquisite.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
