Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Invocation of larger (extended) period of limitation under Section 28(4) of the Customs Act, 1962 - The tribunal found sufficient evidence to support the allegation of willful mis-declaration aimed at evading import duty and compliance requirements. It noted the modus operandi outlined in the show-cause notice, where the importer imported goods in SKD condition to evade duty and compulsory compliance with regulations. Consequently, the tribunal upheld the application of Section 28(4) of the Customs Act, 1962.
Invocation of larger (extended) period of limitation under Section 28(4) of the Customs Act, 1962 - The tribunal found sufficient evidence to support the allegation of willful mis-declaration aimed at evading import duty and compliance requirements. It noted the modus operandi outlined in the show-cause notice, where the importer imported goods in SKD condition to evade duty and compulsory compliance with regulations. Consequently, the tribunal upheld the application of Section 28(4) of the Customs Act, 1962.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
