Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund of Service tax paid - time limitation - The Appellate Tribunal examined the submissions and found that the appellant had self-assessed and paid service tax without claiming the benefit of an exemption notification. Since neither the Central Excise officer modified the assessment nor was the self-assessment appealed against before the Commissioner (Appeals), the assessment remained unchanged. - The Tribunal concluded that refund proceedings cannot modify assessments, whether self-assessed or not. They emphasized that refund proceedings are akin to execution proceedings and should follow the assessment made, without altering it. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the appellant's appeal.
Refund of Service tax paid - time limitation - The Appellate Tribunal examined the submissions and found that the appellant had self-assessed and paid service tax without claiming the benefit of an exemption notification. Since neither the Central Excise officer modified the assessment nor was the self-assessment appealed against before the Commissioner (Appeals), the assessment remained unchanged. - The Tribunal concluded that refund proceedings cannot modify assessments, whether self-assessed or not. They emphasized that refund proceedings are akin to execution proceedings and should follow the assessment made, without altering it. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the appellant's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.