Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Validity of reassessment proceedings - Reason to believe - The tribunal found that there was sufficient "reason to believe" that income had escaped assessment due to the admissions made during the survey. They referenced section 147 and noted that reassessment was justified based on the prima facie evidence available from the survey. - The tribunal concluded that the notices under section 148 were correctly issued, considering the sworn statements and other corroborating material from the survey, such as the admission of bogus purchases.
Validity of reassessment proceedings - Reason to believe - The tribunal found that there was sufficient "reason to believe" that income had escaped assessment due to the admissions made during the survey. They referenced section 147 and noted that reassessment was justified based on the prima facie evidence available from the survey. - The tribunal concluded that the notices under section 148 were correctly issued, considering the sworn statements and other corroborating material from the survey, such as the admission of bogus purchases.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.