Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Reopening of assessment - Reasons to believe - ACIT jurisdiction to issue the notice u/s 148 - The Tribunal concluded that the reasons for reopening were based on credible information from the Investigation Wing, providing sufficient grounds for prima facie belief of income escapement. The approval from the PCIT, although brief, was considered valid as there was no evidence indicating lack of proper application of mind. - The Tribunal rejected the appellant's argument about the notice being issued after the prescribed time limit, noting that the acknowledgment from the postal authorities confirmed receipt within the deadline. Objections regarding reasons for issuing notices under section 143(2) and inadequate time for compliance were deemed meritless.
Reopening of assessment - Reasons to believe - ACIT jurisdiction to issue the notice u/s 148 - The Tribunal concluded that the reasons for reopening were based on credible information from the Investigation Wing, providing sufficient grounds for prima facie belief of income escapement. The approval from the PCIT, although brief, was considered valid as there was no evidence indicating lack of proper application of mind. - The Tribunal rejected the appellant's argument about the notice being issued after the prescribed time limit, noting that the acknowledgment from the postal authorities confirmed receipt within the deadline. Objections regarding reasons for issuing notices under section 143(2) and inadequate time for compliance were deemed meritless.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
