Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Re-quantification of interest (on the refund of the pre-deposit) payment to the appellant - relevant time - The Tribunal focused on the applicable legal provisions, specifically Section 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as amended. It noted that the pre-deposit was made before the amendment of this section, and therefore, the provisions applicable at the time of the deposit govern the interest calculations. The Tribunal upheld the view that interest is payable only after three months from the date of the appellate order, as per the unamended Section 35FF.
Re-quantification of interest (on the refund of the pre-deposit) payment to the appellant - relevant time - The Tribunal focused on the applicable legal provisions, specifically Section 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as amended. It noted that the pre-deposit was made before the amendment of this section, and therefore, the provisions applicable at the time of the deposit govern the interest calculations. The Tribunal upheld the view that interest is payable only after three months from the date of the appellate order, as per the unamended Section 35FF.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.