Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
201 to 220 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Re-quantification of interest (on the refund of the pre-deposit) payment to the appellant - relevant time - The Tribunal focused on the applicable legal provisions, specifically Section 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as amended. It noted that the pre-deposit was made before the amendment of this section, and therefore, the provisions applicable at the time of the deposit govern the interest calculations. The Tribunal upheld the view that interest is payable only after three months from the date of the appellate order, as per the unamended Section 35FF.
Re-quantification of interest (on the refund of the pre-deposit) payment to the appellant - relevant time - The Tribunal focused on the applicable legal provisions, specifically Section 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as amended. It noted that the pre-deposit was made before the amendment of this section, and therefore, the provisions applicable at the time of the deposit govern the interest calculations. The Tribunal upheld the view that interest is payable only after three months from the date of the appellate order, as per the unamended Section 35FF.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.