Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Exemption from GST - pure services or supply of goods to the Notified Area Authority, Vapi - Notified Area Authority, Vapi is a “local authority” or “governmental authority”? - The court found that the Notified Area Authority, Vapi, does not qualify as a "local authority" or "governmental authority" under GST legislation. It noted that while the Authority performs municipal-like functions, it is established under the Gujarat Industrial Development Act and does not fulfill the criteria specified in GST laws for being treated as a municipal entity. The court acknowledged that the petitioner does provide "pure services" involving no supply of goods. However, since the services are rendered to an entity that does not qualify as a "local authority" or "governmental authority," these services cannot be exempt from GST.
Exemption from GST - pure services or supply of goods to the Notified Area Authority, Vapi - Notified Area Authority, Vapi is a “local authority” or “governmental authority”? - The court found that the Notified Area Authority, Vapi, does not qualify as a "local authority" or "governmental authority" under GST legislation. It noted that while the Authority performs municipal-like functions, it is established under the Gujarat Industrial Development Act and does not fulfill the criteria specified in GST laws for being treated as a municipal entity. The court acknowledged that the petitioner does provide "pure services" involving no supply of goods. However, since the services are rendered to an entity that does not qualify as a "local authority" or "governmental authority," these services cannot be exempt from GST.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
