Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The High Court noted that the issue of disallowance under Section 14A of the Act had been thoroughly examined during the original assessment proceedings. It observed that the impugned notice was issued based on the same issue already considered during the original assessment and lacked any fresh tangible material for reopening. The High Court held that the Assessing Officer failed to assume jurisdiction to issue the notice, especially considering that it was issued after four years from the end of the assessment year and after the framing of the original assessment.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The High Court noted that the issue of disallowance under Section 14A of the Act had been thoroughly examined during the original assessment proceedings. It observed that the impugned notice was issued based on the same issue already considered during the original assessment and lacked any fresh tangible material for reopening. The High Court held that the Assessing Officer failed to assume jurisdiction to issue the notice, especially considering that it was issued after four years from the end of the assessment year and after the framing of the original assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
