Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Rectification application u/s 254 - Tribunal not followed the decision on the identical facts by the Coordinate Bench which is confirmed by this Court - The Court emphasized the principle of judicial consistency and the hierarchical nature of judicial decisions, reiterating that lower tribunals are bound by the decisions of their supervisory jurisdictions. As such, ignoring these precedents constituted a mistake apparent from the record, necessitating a review and correction of the Tribunal's decision. The Court remanded the case back to the Tribunal, directing it to amend its decision in alignment with the precedents highlighted by the petitioner.
Rectification application u/s 254 - Tribunal not followed the decision on the identical facts by the Coordinate Bench which is confirmed by this Court - The Court emphasized the principle of judicial consistency and the hierarchical nature of judicial decisions, reiterating that lower tribunals are bound by the decisions of their supervisory jurisdictions. As such, ignoring these precedents constituted a mistake apparent from the record, necessitating a review and correction of the Tribunal's decision. The Court remanded the case back to the Tribunal, directing it to amend its decision in alignment with the precedents highlighted by the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
