Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision u/s 263 - source of cash found in the course of search remains unexplained and additions u/s 69A r.w. Section 115BBE - The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's defense regarding the source of cash found during the search. It noted that the appellant had provided reasonable explanations, including references to previous years' balances, which were accepted by the Assessing Officer (AO). - Regarding the issue of jewellery, the Tribunal highlighted the lack of opportunity provided to the appellant by the Pr.CIT to address this matter. It emphasized that principles of natural justice were breached, as the appellant was not given a chance to defend against the allegations related to jewellery. Ultimately, the Tribunal set aside the revisional order and upheld the appellant's appeals.
Revision u/s 263 - source of cash found in the course of search remains unexplained and additions u/s 69A r.w. Section 115BBE - The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's defense regarding the source of cash found during the search. It noted that the appellant had provided reasonable explanations, including references to previous years' balances, which were accepted by the Assessing Officer (AO). - Regarding the issue of jewellery, the Tribunal highlighted the lack of opportunity provided to the appellant by the Pr.CIT to address this matter. It emphasized that principles of natural justice were breached, as the appellant was not given a chance to defend against the allegations related to jewellery. Ultimately, the Tribunal set aside the revisional order and upheld the appellant's appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
