Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Retraction of statement given during survey - evidentiary value of statement recorded u/s 131 - Despite the retraction, the initial findings of the CIT(A) were largely upheld, as the tribunal found no concrete evidence supporting the assessee's claims of coercion, aside from the letter of retraction and an affidavit. The assessee was found to have unexplained excess cash and stock discrepancies. The Tribunal noted the lack of complete physical verification of stock during the survey but ultimately confirmed the addition, adjusting the gross profit rate applied from 10% to 8.02%, acknowledging some merit in the assessee's submissions regarding the survey’s conduct.
Retraction of statement given during survey - evidentiary value of statement recorded u/s 131 - Despite the retraction, the initial findings of the CIT(A) were largely upheld, as the tribunal found no concrete evidence supporting the assessee's claims of coercion, aside from the letter of retraction and an affidavit. The assessee was found to have unexplained excess cash and stock discrepancies. The Tribunal noted the lack of complete physical verification of stock during the survey but ultimately confirmed the addition, adjusting the gross profit rate applied from 10% to 8.02%, acknowledging some merit in the assessee's submissions regarding the survey’s conduct.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.