Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
Refund claim - rejection on the grounds of unjust enrichment - The tribunal noted that invoices presented by the appellant showed the duty being passed onto the consumers. The tribunal stressed that uniform prices before and after the duty imposition did not conclusively prove that the duty was absorbed by the appellant. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, confirming that the amount was rightly credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund, adhering to the principles of unjust enrichment.
Refund claim - rejection on the grounds of unjust enrichment - The tribunal noted that invoices presented by the appellant showed the duty being passed onto the consumers. The tribunal stressed that uniform prices before and after the duty imposition did not conclusively prove that the duty was absorbed by the appellant. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, confirming that the amount was rightly credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund, adhering to the principles of unjust enrichment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
