Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of assessment order - as argued without giving the petitioner an opportunity to reply by granting adjournment, the second respondent has now passed the assessment order by adding a further sum towards addition u/s 68 - The High Court, after careful consideration, agreed with the petitioner's contentions. It found that the order lacked procedural fairness and that the additions to the taxable income were not justified. As a result, the impugned order was quashed, and the case was remitted back to the first respondent for fresh assessment within 90 days.
Validity of assessment order - as argued without giving the petitioner an opportunity to reply by granting adjournment, the second respondent has now passed the assessment order by adding a further sum towards addition u/s 68 - The High Court, after careful consideration, agreed with the petitioner's contentions. It found that the order lacked procedural fairness and that the additions to the taxable income were not justified. As a result, the impugned order was quashed, and the case was remitted back to the first respondent for fresh assessment within 90 days.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
