Consequential appeal-effect orders must implement rectification deleting working-capital adjustments and reconsider the resulting arm's-length range c...
Discounted cash flow valuation protects share premium where projections are reasonable, while audited book expenses defeat unexplained-expenditure add...
Section 54 construction relief survives pre-transfer commencement when completion occurs within the statutory period, excluding ineligible spouse-owne...
Fraud classification show-cause notices founded on inconclusive forensic audit material cannot sustain action, permitting fresh proceedings on conclus...
Validity of assessment order - as argued without giving the petitioner an opportunity to reply by granting adjournment, the second respondent has now passed the assessment order by adding a further sum towards addition u/s 68 - The High Court, after careful consideration, agreed with the petitioner's contentions. It found that the order lacked procedural fairness and that the additions to the taxable income were not justified. As a result, the impugned order was quashed, and the case was remitted back to the first respondent for fresh assessment within 90 days.
Validity of assessment order - as argued without giving the petitioner an opportunity to reply by granting adjournment, the second respondent has now passed the assessment order by adding a further sum towards addition u/s 68 - The High Court, after careful consideration, agreed with the petitioner's contentions. It found that the order lacked procedural fairness and that the additions to the taxable income were not justified. As a result, the impugned order was quashed, and the case was remitted back to the first respondent for fresh assessment within 90 days.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4883 
