Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Dishonour of Cheque - Plea to expedite the trial of a complaint - Case of applicant is that though this complaint under the Act, 1881 was filed in the year 2022, but the trial could not be concluded - The High Court, after considering the submissions and examining relevant legal provisions, as well as referring to Supreme Court directives emphasizing expeditious disposal of cases under Section 138, made a decision. It directed the Chief Judicial Magistrate to conclude the trial expeditiously, preferably within six months from the receipt of the order, in line with statutory provisions and judicial precedents.
Dishonour of Cheque - Plea to expedite the trial of a complaint - Case of applicant is that though this complaint under the Act, 1881 was filed in the year 2022, but the trial could not be concluded - The High Court, after considering the submissions and examining relevant legal provisions, as well as referring to Supreme Court directives emphasizing expeditious disposal of cases under Section 138, made a decision. It directed the Chief Judicial Magistrate to conclude the trial expeditiously, preferably within six months from the receipt of the order, in line with statutory provisions and judicial precedents.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.