Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Service of SCN - Breach of principles of natural justice - intimation and SCN uploaded on the “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab on the GST portal and not communicated to the petitioner through any other mode - Upon reviewing the impugned order, the High Court observes that the tax proposal was confirmed solely because the petitioner failed to reply to the show cause notice by enclosing relevant documents. The Court decides to set aside the impugned order and remand the matter for reconsideration. The petitioner is required to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within three weeks from receiving a copy of the order. Additionally, the petitioner is allowed to submit a reply to the show cause notice within this period.
Service of SCN - Breach of principles of natural justice - intimation and SCN uploaded on the “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab on the GST portal and not communicated to the petitioner through any other mode - Upon reviewing the impugned order, the High Court observes that the tax proposal was confirmed solely because the petitioner failed to reply to the show cause notice by enclosing relevant documents. The Court decides to set aside the impugned order and remand the matter for reconsideration. The petitioner is required to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within three weeks from receiving a copy of the order. Additionally, the petitioner is allowed to submit a reply to the show cause notice within this period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.