Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalties u/s 112 and section 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 - classification of goods imported under duty exemption entitlement certificate (DEEC) scheme - The tribunal finds fault with the reclassification adopted in the impugned order, as it fails to specify the tariff item and associated rate of duty, as required by the Customs Act. Moreover, the tribunal highlights the lack of clarity in distinguishing between alloy and non-alloy steel and criticizes the simultaneous application of valuation rules, which runs counter to prescribed procedures. The tribunal concludes that the reclassification lacks legal validity. - Due to foundational lacunae and subsequent developments, the tribunal sets aside the order and directs a rehearing of the matter, allowing both parties to present their arguments afresh.
Penalties u/s 112 and section 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 - classification of goods imported under duty exemption entitlement certificate (DEEC) scheme - The tribunal finds fault with the reclassification adopted in the impugned order, as it fails to specify the tariff item and associated rate of duty, as required by the Customs Act. Moreover, the tribunal highlights the lack of clarity in distinguishing between alloy and non-alloy steel and criticizes the simultaneous application of valuation rules, which runs counter to prescribed procedures. The tribunal concludes that the reclassification lacks legal validity. - Due to foundational lacunae and subsequent developments, the tribunal sets aside the order and directs a rehearing of the matter, allowing both parties to present their arguments afresh.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
