PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Condonation of delay in filing returns - due to ill-health, returns (GSTR-3B) could not be filed within the time prescribed by the second respondent - The petitioner, relying on Section 62(2) of the State Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, argued that the assessment order should be withdrawn since the returns were filed within 30 days from the receipt of the order, as per the amendment extending the time limit to 60 days. - The Court acknowledged the petitioner's argument and directed them to file an application to condone the delay within 15 days. Upon filing the application, the respondents were instructed to consider the reasons provided for the delay and permit the filing of revised returns accordingly.
Condonation of delay in filing returns - due to ill-health, returns (GSTR-3B) could not be filed within the time prescribed by the second respondent - The petitioner, relying on Section 62(2) of the State Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, argued that the assessment order should be withdrawn since the returns were filed within 30 days from the receipt of the order, as per the amendment extending the time limit to 60 days. - The Court acknowledged the petitioner's argument and directed them to file an application to condone the delay within 15 days. Upon filing the application, the respondents were instructed to consider the reasons provided for the delay and permit the filing of revised returns accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
