Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of service tax - various public amenities provided by the Municipal Corporation such as market space, bus stands, vehicle stands, slaughter houses etc. - After considering the submissions and evidence, the Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the taxability of civic amenities, stating that they were sovereign functions exempt from tax. However, they upheld the tax demand for telecom services, as part of the amounts received were deemed payments for services rendered. The Tribunal also accepted the Commissioner's methodology for tax calculation but set aside the demand for the extended period due to lack of evidence of intent to evade payment. The matter was remanded for redetermination of taxes considering factual errors and duplication of taxes. All penalties were set aside.
Levy of service tax - various public amenities provided by the Municipal Corporation such as market space, bus stands, vehicle stands, slaughter houses etc. - After considering the submissions and evidence, the Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the taxability of civic amenities, stating that they were sovereign functions exempt from tax. However, they upheld the tax demand for telecom services, as part of the amounts received were deemed payments for services rendered. The Tribunal also accepted the Commissioner's methodology for tax calculation but set aside the demand for the extended period due to lack of evidence of intent to evade payment. The matter was remanded for redetermination of taxes considering factual errors and duplication of taxes. All penalties were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.