Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Smuggling - Absolute confiscation of foreign currency seized from the Appellant u/s 113(d),(e) & (h) of the Customs Act - The Tribunal found that there was only a venial breach of Section 113(d) of the Customs Act, implying that the Appellant had the intention to export but had not entered the customs area. - The Tribunal acknowledged that while the Appellant had intentions to travel outside India and possessed foreign currency, absolute confiscation was not justified. Instead, the Tribunal upheld confiscation under Section 113(d) of the Customs Act but allowed redemption upon payment of a fine.
Smuggling - Absolute confiscation of foreign currency seized from the Appellant u/s 113(d),(e) & (h) of the Customs Act - The Tribunal found that there was only a venial breach of Section 113(d) of the Customs Act, implying that the Appellant had the intention to export but had not entered the customs area. - The Tribunal acknowledged that while the Appellant had intentions to travel outside India and possessed foreign currency, absolute confiscation was not justified. Instead, the Tribunal upheld confiscation under Section 113(d) of the Customs Act but allowed redemption upon payment of a fine.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
