Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Violation of principles of natural justice - cryptic order - excess claim Input Tax Credit - Despite the petitioner submitting a detailed reply, the court found that the impugned order failed to adequately consider their response. The court noted deficiencies in the order's assessment of the petitioner's submissions and its failure to seek clarifications if deemed necessary. Consequently, the High Court set aside the order and remitted the matter for re-adjudication, directing the Proper Officer to provide specific details or documents required from the petitioner. The court reserved its consideration on the merits of the case and left open the challenge to a specific notification.
Violation of principles of natural justice - cryptic order - excess claim Input Tax Credit - Despite the petitioner submitting a detailed reply, the court found that the impugned order failed to adequately consider their response. The court noted deficiencies in the order's assessment of the petitioner's submissions and its failure to seek clarifications if deemed necessary. Consequently, the High Court set aside the order and remitted the matter for re-adjudication, directing the Proper Officer to provide specific details or documents required from the petitioner. The court reserved its consideration on the merits of the case and left open the challenge to a specific notification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.