Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Conversion from an unlimited liability company to a limited liability company - Section 18 of the Companies Act, 2013 - Applicability of the amendments to Section 18 and Rule 37 - To be applied retrospectively for the application filed before the amendment or not - The High Court rejected the appellant's contention that it had a vested right to conversion under the unamended Act, stating that approval must align with the law as it exists at the time of granting such approval. The Court further reasoned that the amendment was curative in nature, designed to protect creditors' interests by introducing additional criteria for conversion, including the necessity for NOCs.
Conversion from an unlimited liability company to a limited liability company - Section 18 of the Companies Act, 2013 - Applicability of the amendments to Section 18 and Rule 37 - To be applied retrospectively for the application filed before the amendment or not - The High Court rejected the appellant's contention that it had a vested right to conversion under the unamended Act, stating that approval must align with the law as it exists at the time of granting such approval. The Court further reasoned that the amendment was curative in nature, designed to protect creditors' interests by introducing additional criteria for conversion, including the necessity for NOCs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
