Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Maintainability of Criminal proceedings - illegal allotment of shares - illegal appointment of petitioner as a director and transfer of shares - The court highlighted the distinct domains of the NCLT and criminal courts, stressing that findings in civil adjudications (NCLT) do not automatically negate criminal prosecutions. - The court scrutinized the allegations of digital signature misuse, unauthorized share transfers, and surreptitious changes in directorship. It found that these allegations, supported by evidence collected during the investigation, merited closer examination under criminal law, contrary to the trial court's decision which leaned heavily on NCLT findings. - n a pivotal move, the High Court set aside the trial court's order, remanding the matter for a fresh evaluation.
Maintainability of Criminal proceedings - illegal allotment of shares - illegal appointment of petitioner as a director and transfer of shares - The court highlighted the distinct domains of the NCLT and criminal courts, stressing that findings in civil adjudications (NCLT) do not automatically negate criminal prosecutions. - The court scrutinized the allegations of digital signature misuse, unauthorized share transfers, and surreptitious changes in directorship. It found that these allegations, supported by evidence collected during the investigation, merited closer examination under criminal law, contrary to the trial court's decision which leaned heavily on NCLT findings. - n a pivotal move, the High Court set aside the trial court's order, remanding the matter for a fresh evaluation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.