Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Violation of principles of natural justice - It was contended that impugned order does not take into consideration the reply submitted by the Petitioner and is a cryptic order - The High Court found that the impugned order failed to properly consider the petitioner's detailed reply. Instead, it merely stated that the reply was unsatisfactory without providing specific reasons or engaging with the content of the response. This lack of substantive consideration indicated that the Proper Officer did not apply their mind to the petitioner's submission. - Matter restored back for reconsideration.
Violation of principles of natural justice - It was contended that impugned order does not take into consideration the reply submitted by the Petitioner and is a cryptic order - The High Court found that the impugned order failed to properly consider the petitioner's detailed reply. Instead, it merely stated that the reply was unsatisfactory without providing specific reasons or engaging with the content of the response. This lack of substantive consideration indicated that the Proper Officer did not apply their mind to the petitioner's submission. - Matter restored back for reconsideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
