Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Validity of assessment order passed u/s 153C - Third Member Order - addition u/s 69A r.w.s. 115BBE - cash deposited in various bank accounts post demonetization - search and seizure operation carried out in case of Third Party - The tribunal concluded that the assessment order under section 143(3) read with section 153C was invalid. This conclusion was primarily based on the procedural impropriety in the issuance of the assessment order without proper compliance with the prerequisites outlined in section 153C, notably the recording of satisfaction. - Regarding the Cash Deposit, the tribunal underscored the importance of drawing statutory presumptions against the entity in whose name the deposits were made, rather than the assessee, in the absence of incontrovertible proof to the contrary.
Validity of assessment order passed u/s 153C - Third Member Order - addition u/s 69A r.w.s. 115BBE - cash deposited in various bank accounts post demonetization - search and seizure operation carried out in case of Third Party - The tribunal concluded that the assessment order under section 143(3) read with section 153C was invalid. This conclusion was primarily based on the procedural impropriety in the issuance of the assessment order without proper compliance with the prerequisites outlined in section 153C, notably the recording of satisfaction. - Regarding the Cash Deposit, the tribunal underscored the importance of drawing statutory presumptions against the entity in whose name the deposits were made, rather than the assessee, in the absence of incontrovertible proof to the contrary.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.