Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of Order for Demand Notice - The case involved a dispute over Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by the petitioner for purchases made from a supplier who failed to fulfill certain GST obligations. The Department issued a demand to recover the ITC, alleging contravention of relevant provisions. The petitioner, however, argued procedural irregularities, asserting that the adjudication authority passed orders without proper consideration of their submissions. They claimed unawareness of the proceedings until orally informed about the recovery by the Department. The High Court, considering the petitioner's contentions, condoned the delay in filing the appeal and directed them to pay a portion of the disputed tax before preferring the appeal.
Validity of Order for Demand Notice - The case involved a dispute over Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by the petitioner for purchases made from a supplier who failed to fulfill certain GST obligations. The Department issued a demand to recover the ITC, alleging contravention of relevant provisions. The petitioner, however, argued procedural irregularities, asserting that the adjudication authority passed orders without proper consideration of their submissions. They claimed unawareness of the proceedings until orally informed about the recovery by the Department. The High Court, considering the petitioner's contentions, condoned the delay in filing the appeal and directed them to pay a portion of the disputed tax before preferring the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.