Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Exemption from GST - Pure services or not - supply of service for turpentine treatment - The MOU provided by the applicant indicates the provision of security guards to a Panchayat Samiti, which is considered a local authority. However, the service of security does not directly relate to functions entrusted to a Panchayat under Article 243G of the Constitution. - The absence of specific work orders or contracts provided by the applicant makes it difficult to determine the nature of these services. However, based on the description provided, it appears that these services involve the supply of goods along with manpower, making them composite supplies and not pure services. Consequently, they do not qualify for exemption under the notification. - The Advance Ruling Authority concludes that the applicant is not eligible for exemption benefits under Sr. No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate)
Exemption from GST - Pure services or not - supply of service for turpentine treatment - The MOU provided by the applicant indicates the provision of security guards to a Panchayat Samiti, which is considered a local authority. However, the service of security does not directly relate to functions entrusted to a Panchayat under Article 243G of the Constitution. - The absence of specific work orders or contracts provided by the applicant makes it difficult to determine the nature of these services. However, based on the description provided, it appears that these services involve the supply of goods along with manpower, making them composite supplies and not pure services. Consequently, they do not qualify for exemption under the notification. - The Advance Ruling Authority concludes that the applicant is not eligible for exemption benefits under Sr. No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate)
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
