Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Rectification u/s 154 application rejected as being time barred - The Appellate Tribunal agreed with the assessee's contention that the rectification application was not time-barred. It held that the clock for the four-year limitation period starts only when the assessee is in receipt of the order to be rectified. Since there was no evidence that the intimation under Section 143(1) was served on the assessee, the limitation period did not begin, and the application was well within the stipulated time.
Rectification u/s 154 application rejected as being time barred - The Appellate Tribunal agreed with the assessee's contention that the rectification application was not time-barred. It held that the clock for the four-year limitation period starts only when the assessee is in receipt of the order to be rectified. Since there was no evidence that the intimation under Section 143(1) was served on the assessee, the limitation period did not begin, and the application was well within the stipulated time.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
