Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Refund of the excess duty paid - whether subsequent negotiation of the prices can be the basis for reopening the assessment? - The Tribunal observed that the appellant cleared goods on stock transfer basis to their depots, adopting the price prevailing at or nearest to the time of sale from the depots. This was done in accordance with Rule 7 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules. Subsequent negotiation of prices did not affect the assessable value already determined and on which duty liability was discharged. The Tribunal cited precedent to support this conclusion.
Refund of the excess duty paid - whether subsequent negotiation of the prices can be the basis for reopening the assessment? - The Tribunal observed that the appellant cleared goods on stock transfer basis to their depots, adopting the price prevailing at or nearest to the time of sale from the depots. This was done in accordance with Rule 7 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules. Subsequent negotiation of prices did not affect the assessable value already determined and on which duty liability was discharged. The Tribunal cited precedent to support this conclusion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
