Inaccurate-particulars penalties fail where transfer-pricing documentation shows good faith and due diligence, and underlying capital-gains additions ...
Transfer-pricing tolerance for software sub-licensing falls within the services range, eliminating the adjustment and requiring TDS-credit verificatio...
Customs Broker due diligence requires prescribed KYC, not detecting misdeclarations discoverable only through physical examination, defeating licence ...
E-filing system failure permits exclusion of affected time in insolvency appeals, preventing tribunal technology defects from defeating timely filings...
Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Page of 4888
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
741 to 760 of 97755 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Liability of Collect Tax at Source (TCS) - Exempt supplies - Section 52 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) - Petitioner operating an e-auction service for agricultural and non-agricultural commodities. It is contended that payment for the contract can either be settled through the Petitioner’s platform, or it can be settled directly between the buyer and seller. The Petitioner does not guarantee settlement of transactions by way of delivery of goods or payment. The Petitioner merely charges transaction fees for providing the platform to its members for the purpose of e-auction. - The High Court, after considering the submissions of both parties, directs the adjudicating officer to address the petitioner's preliminary objections regarding the applicability of Section 52 of the CGST Act.
Liability of Collect Tax at Source (TCS) - Exempt supplies - Section 52 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) - Petitioner operating an e-auction service for agricultural and non-agricultural commodities. It is contended that payment for the contract can either be settled through the Petitioner’s platform, or it can be settled directly between the buyer and seller. The Petitioner does not guarantee settlement of transactions by way of delivery of goods or payment. The Petitioner merely charges transaction fees for providing the platform to its members for the purpose of e-auction. - The High Court, after considering the submissions of both parties, directs the adjudicating officer to address the petitioner's preliminary objections regarding the applicability of Section 52 of the CGST Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.