Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment without releasing seized documents by Crime branch - Petitioner seeking the release of seized documents and items to effectively respond to reassessment notices. Despite a court order directing the release of seized items, the petitioner allegedly failed to diligently pursue their release over several years. The High Court noted the petitioner's lack of effort in complying with court orders and found the petition to be an abuse of the judicial process. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition and imposed costs on the petitioner.
Reopening of assessment without releasing seized documents by Crime branch - Petitioner seeking the release of seized documents and items to effectively respond to reassessment notices. Despite a court order directing the release of seized items, the petitioner allegedly failed to diligently pursue their release over several years. The High Court noted the petitioner's lack of effort in complying with court orders and found the petition to be an abuse of the judicial process. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition and imposed costs on the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
