Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rectification u/s 154 - Exemption u/s 11(2) - Accumulation of income - The Appellate Tribunal found merit in the appellant's contention regarding the amount to be accumulated under section 11(2) of the Act. - It was established that the appellant had accumulated Rs. 110,94,73,718/- in the specified modes under section 11(5) of the Act, which was lower than the required accumulation of Rs. 120,00,31,900/-. - Therefore, the deduction under section 11(2) was allowable only on the amount accumulated, resulting in a partial allowance of the claim.
Rectification u/s 154 - Exemption u/s 11(2) - Accumulation of income - The Appellate Tribunal found merit in the appellant's contention regarding the amount to be accumulated under section 11(2) of the Act. - It was established that the appellant had accumulated Rs. 110,94,73,718/- in the specified modes under section 11(5) of the Act, which was lower than the required accumulation of Rs. 120,00,31,900/-. - Therefore, the deduction under section 11(2) was allowable only on the amount accumulated, resulting in a partial allowance of the claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
