Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
Disciplinary proportionality requires penalties for Authorised Representative misconduct to match proven harm, leading to reconsideration of registrat...
Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Page of 4927
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 98535 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Jurisdiction to issue SCN - Ocean Freight - contention of the petitioner is to the effect that, what has been sought to be invoked the Notification No. 8/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28/6/2017 in issuing the show cause notice which itself has been struck down by the Division Bench of Gujarat High Court - The petitioner argued that the notice lacked jurisdiction due to the invalidity of the notification. The High Court upheld the petitioner's arguments, emphasizing the illegality of applying an ultra vires notification and the lack of jurisdiction in the show cause notice. It also reaffirmed the interpretation of GST laws established in previous judgments, supporting the petitioner's case. Overall, the court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the show cause notice and allowing for a refund of taxes paid under protest.
Jurisdiction to issue SCN - Ocean Freight - contention of the petitioner is to the effect that, what has been sought to be invoked the Notification No. 8/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28/6/2017 in issuing the show cause notice which itself has been struck down by the Division Bench of Gujarat High Court - The petitioner argued that the notice lacked jurisdiction due to the invalidity of the notification. The High Court upheld the petitioner's arguments, emphasizing the illegality of applying an ultra vires notification and the lack of jurisdiction in the show cause notice. It also reaffirmed the interpretation of GST laws established in previous judgments, supporting the petitioner's case. Overall, the court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the show cause notice and allowing for a refund of taxes paid under protest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4927 
