Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) erroneously - The supplier made a mistake by filing the return in Form GSTR-1 by specifying total integrated tax (IGST) as zero in the relevant column - The High Court observed that while suppliers may make errors, recipients are equally responsible for rectifying incorrect claims to maintain GST system integrity. However, it noted that in this case, the SGST component did reach the State of Tamil Nadu, contradicting the assessing officer's view. - The Court quashed the impugned order. The matter was remanded to the assessing officer for reconsideration, with directions to issue a fresh assessment order within a specified timeframe.
Denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) erroneously - The supplier made a mistake by filing the return in Form GSTR-1 by specifying total integrated tax (IGST) as zero in the relevant column - The High Court observed that while suppliers may make errors, recipients are equally responsible for rectifying incorrect claims to maintain GST system integrity. However, it noted that in this case, the SGST component did reach the State of Tamil Nadu, contradicting the assessing officer's view. - The Court quashed the impugned order. The matter was remanded to the assessing officer for reconsideration, with directions to issue a fresh assessment order within a specified timeframe.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
