Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Assessment u/s 153C - The High court found procedural lapses in invoking Section 153C against the petitioner without concrete evidence of undisclosed transactions for the relevant assessment year. It highlighted the absence of incriminating material specific to the petitioner for the year in question, rendering the invocation of Section 153C unjustifiable. - Reassessment under Section 148: The court clarified that proceedings under Section 148, aimed at reassessing income believed to have escaped assessment, could continue provided they were based on substantive evidence and not merely on the procedural fallout of a search operation targeting a different entity.
Assessment u/s 153C - The High court found procedural lapses in invoking Section 153C against the petitioner without concrete evidence of undisclosed transactions for the relevant assessment year. It highlighted the absence of incriminating material specific to the petitioner for the year in question, rendering the invocation of Section 153C unjustifiable. - Reassessment under Section 148: The court clarified that proceedings under Section 148, aimed at reassessing income believed to have escaped assessment, could continue provided they were based on substantive evidence and not merely on the procedural fallout of a search operation targeting a different entity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4886 
