Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Income deemed to accrue or arise in India - Payments received by the assessee from it Indian customers on account of Centralized Services - Fee for Technical Services as defined u/s 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 or “Fee for included Services as defined u/Article 12(4)(a) of the India-US DTAA - The Appellate Tribunal, after considering the submissions and precedents, upheld the decision of the CIT(A), agreeing that the payments received by the assessee were not in the nature of FTS under the Income Tax Act or the DTAA. The Tribunal noted that the issue was squarely covered in favor of the assessee by its own past cases and the rulings of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court.
Income deemed to accrue or arise in India - Payments received by the assessee from it Indian customers on account of Centralized Services - Fee for Technical Services as defined u/s 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 or “Fee for included Services as defined u/Article 12(4)(a) of the India-US DTAA - The Appellate Tribunal, after considering the submissions and precedents, upheld the decision of the CIT(A), agreeing that the payments received by the assessee were not in the nature of FTS under the Income Tax Act or the DTAA. The Tribunal noted that the issue was squarely covered in favor of the assessee by its own past cases and the rulings of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
