Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insolvency and BankruptcyMarch 29, 2024Case LawsAT
Admission of Section 7 application under IBC - The Appellant contests the admission, citing the submission of a One Time Settlement (OTS) proposal and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) circular regarding OTS proposals. - The Tribunal acknowledges the OTS proposal and the Bank's 'no objection' for deferring the pronouncement of the order. However, it emphasizes the need for justice and provides an opportunity for the Appellant to deposit the offered amount within 90 days. The Tribunal also addresses the validity of Section 10-A of IBC, directing the deposit of the offered amount within the specified time frame. Overall, the Tribunal focuses on resolving the matter effectively while ensuring fairness and justice.
Admission of Section 7 application under IBC - The Appellant contests the admission, citing the submission of a One Time Settlement (OTS) proposal and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) circular regarding OTS proposals. - The Tribunal acknowledges the OTS proposal and the Bank's 'no objection' for deferring the pronouncement of the order. However, it emphasizes the need for justice and provides an opportunity for the Appellant to deposit the offered amount within 90 days. The Tribunal also addresses the validity of Section 10-A of IBC, directing the deposit of the offered amount within the specified time frame. Overall, the Tribunal focuses on resolving the matter effectively while ensuring fairness and justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
