Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Refund of Service Tax - Principles of unjust enrichment - The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case where the appellant, a service provider, erroneously charged Service Tax, which was later found to be inapplicable due to a Board circular. The appellant issued Credit Notes and sought a refund, which was initially rejected based on the unjust enrichment clause. However, the Tribunal deemed the Credit Notes valid and instructed further verification. - Consequently, the matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for proper examination within a specified timeframe.
Refund of Service Tax - Principles of unjust enrichment - The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case where the appellant, a service provider, erroneously charged Service Tax, which was later found to be inapplicable due to a Board circular. The appellant issued Credit Notes and sought a refund, which was initially rejected based on the unjust enrichment clause. However, the Tribunal deemed the Credit Notes valid and instructed further verification. - Consequently, the matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for proper examination within a specified timeframe.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.