Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate revie...
Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
Non-payment of service tax - The Appellate Tribunal held that the demand was not sustainable due to being beyond the limitation period, as the department was aware of the appellant's activities. - It ruled that the appellant's activities did not qualify as Business Support Service, as they were primarily in the public interest, not for promoting private business. - However, the Tribunal found the appellant liable to pay service tax under the category of Renting of Immovable Property Service, as the properties were rented out for commercial purposes. - The demand under Sale of Space and Time for Advertisement Service was deemed not sustainable due to being beyond the limitation period.
Non-payment of service tax - The Appellate Tribunal held that the demand was not sustainable due to being beyond the limitation period, as the department was aware of the appellant's activities. - It ruled that the appellant's activities did not qualify as Business Support Service, as they were primarily in the public interest, not for promoting private business. - However, the Tribunal found the appellant liable to pay service tax under the category of Renting of Immovable Property Service, as the properties were rented out for commercial purposes. - The demand under Sale of Space and Time for Advertisement Service was deemed not sustainable due to being beyond the limitation period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4894 
