Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deduction of interest expenditure incurred on borrowed funds u/s 57 - Interest incurred on borrowed funds utilized for making investment in shares in company of Singapore - The ITAT considered the purpose of the investment, emphasizing that the investment was made to earn future income. It referred to a similar case decided by the Calcutta High Court, which held that expenditure on interest could be allowable under Section 57 even if the investment was not solely for earning dividends. The Tribunal concluded that since the investment was made to generate income, the interest expenditure should be allowed as a deduction.
Deduction of interest expenditure incurred on borrowed funds u/s 57 - Interest incurred on borrowed funds utilized for making investment in shares in company of Singapore - The ITAT considered the purpose of the investment, emphasizing that the investment was made to earn future income. It referred to a similar case decided by the Calcutta High Court, which held that expenditure on interest could be allowable under Section 57 even if the investment was not solely for earning dividends. The Tribunal concluded that since the investment was made to generate income, the interest expenditure should be allowed as a deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
