Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
TDS u/s 195 - payment received for interconnect usage charges - transaction with non-treaty country - The assessee contested the taxability of these payments as "royalty" and argued for the consideration of DTAA provisions. The Tribunal following the decision of the High Court's judgment, clarified that DTAA can indeed be considered in such proceedings and that amendments to the Income Tax Act do not automatically amend DTAA provisions. The ITAT further held that payments made to non-resident telecom operators for interconnect services are not taxable as royalty. Additionally, it affirmed that Income Tax Authorities lack jurisdiction to tax income arising from extraterritorial sources.
TDS u/s 195 - payment received for interconnect usage charges - transaction with non-treaty country - The assessee contested the taxability of these payments as "royalty" and argued for the consideration of DTAA provisions. The Tribunal following the decision of the High Court's judgment, clarified that DTAA can indeed be considered in such proceedings and that amendments to the Income Tax Act do not automatically amend DTAA provisions. The ITAT further held that payments made to non-resident telecom operators for interconnect services are not taxable as royalty. Additionally, it affirmed that Income Tax Authorities lack jurisdiction to tax income arising from extraterritorial sources.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.