Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) and Section 114AA of CA on Chartered Engineer - Issuance of Certificate under EPCG scheme without verification - The case involved the issuance of a Chartered Engineer Certificate for the installation and use of imported machinery under the EPCG scheme without verifying whether the machines were actually installed. The Department imposed penalties for non-compliance with verification requirements. The appellant argued good faith reliance on submitted documents and emphasized their limited role in verifying installation. However, the Tribunal held them liable for penalties, considering the seriousness of the offense.
Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) and Section 114AA of CA on Chartered Engineer - Issuance of Certificate under EPCG scheme without verification - The case involved the issuance of a Chartered Engineer Certificate for the installation and use of imported machinery under the EPCG scheme without verifying whether the machines were actually installed. The Department imposed penalties for non-compliance with verification requirements. The appellant argued good faith reliance on submitted documents and emphasized their limited role in verifying installation. However, the Tribunal held them liable for penalties, considering the seriousness of the offense.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
