Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Indirect corporate control can create related-party status, excluding financial creditors from Committee of Creditors representation, participation an...
Scientific research association approval requires continuing SIRO status, annual donation reporting, and donor certificates for the approved foundatio...
Scientific research institution approval is conditional on SIRO recognition, annual donation reporting, donor certification, and prescribed compliance...
Page of 4878
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 97553 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund claim - Period of limitation - Double Taxation - The respondent had also paid tax on the same invoices. - The petitioner sought direction for the refund of Input Tax Credit (ITC) paid on invoices for a specific period, alleging coercion due to the respondent's delayed filing of returns. The respondent argued that the petitioner's claim lacked merit due to the absence of a proper refund application. The court disposed of the petition by permitting the petitioner to file a refund application within one week, considering the exclusion of certain periods for limitation purposes.
Refund claim - Period of limitation - Double Taxation - The respondent had also paid tax on the same invoices. - The petitioner sought direction for the refund of Input Tax Credit (ITC) paid on invoices for a specific period, alleging coercion due to the respondent's delayed filing of returns. The respondent argued that the petitioner's claim lacked merit due to the absence of a proper refund application. The court disposed of the petition by permitting the petitioner to file a refund application within one week, considering the exclusion of certain periods for limitation purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4878 
