Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reasons to believe - The court examined the reasons recorded for re-assessment provided to the petitioner and compared them with the proforma maintained by the respondent. It noted minor differences in language but found that the substance of the reasons remained consistent. The court emphasized that the material basis for initiating re-assessment was the same in both documents, and minor variations in language did not warrant interference with the proceedings. - The writ petition was dismissed, upholding the validity of the notices issued for re-assessment.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reasons to believe - The court examined the reasons recorded for re-assessment provided to the petitioner and compared them with the proforma maintained by the respondent. It noted minor differences in language but found that the substance of the reasons remained consistent. The court emphasized that the material basis for initiating re-assessment was the same in both documents, and minor variations in language did not warrant interference with the proceedings. - The writ petition was dismissed, upholding the validity of the notices issued for re-assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.