Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
Juridical seat versus arbitral venue determines supervisory court jurisdiction, while timely award challenges remain within the prescribed limitation ...
Addition u/s 68 - bogus share application/allotment money - The Court noted the factual examination done by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the share capital of the companies involved. It found that the share capital raised by one of the companies in the assessment year 2009-10 had already been added back in the hands of the party, indicating its genuineness. The Court upheld the action of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and ITAT in deleting the additions.
Addition u/s 68 - bogus share application/allotment money - The Court noted the factual examination done by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the share capital of the companies involved. It found that the share capital raised by one of the companies in the assessment year 2009-10 had already been added back in the hands of the party, indicating its genuineness. The Court upheld the action of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and ITAT in deleting the additions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.